Skip to main content

Berkouwer and some other theologians

Berkouwer is a theologian whose voice deserves to be heard much more than it has been. A lot of people don't know much about him. They've heard his name from writers who dismiss him because they are wary of him.
There is a historical progression in the chair of Systematic Theology at the Free University of Amsterdam - Kuyper, Bavinck, Valentinius Hepp, Berkouwer. There is also a theological progression involving Kuyper, Bavinck and Berkouwer. It is a movement away from scholasticism. Valentinius Hepp was not part of this theological progression. He was a scholastic. Berkouwer rarely mentions him. It's like he is saying, 'Let's bypass Hepp - playing him down by ignoring him - & go back to Bavinck'. By his frequent references to Bavinck, Berkouwer seeks to emphasize the continuity between himself and Bavinck. Berkouwer's references to Bavinck are generally positive. He develops ideas that are found in Bavinck. He draws more from Bavinck than he does from Kuyper.
Berkouwer didn't draw much from Emil Brunner. Two passages - one in 'General Revelation' & the other in 'The Person of Christ' come to mind. In both cases, Berkouwer distances himself from Brunner.
Berkouwer is very different from Cornelius Van Til! I can't recall much reference to Van Til in Berkouwer's writings other than at the end of 'The Triumph of Grace in the Theology of Karl Barth' where Berkouwer distances himself from Van Til's critique of Barth.
Berkouwer on Barth. In 'The Triumph of Grace in the Theology of Karl Barth', he is penetratingly critical. In 'A Half Century of Theology', he is more positive.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Berkouwer’s “Holy Scripture” and E J Young’s “Thy Word is Truth”

E J Young argues that one’s doctrine of Scripture is derived from either experience or Scripture, either natural man or supernatural God. Young does speak of the human character of Scripture. It does, however, seem that the supernatural-natural dichotomy underlies his doctrine of Scripture. He turns to the Bible “to discover what it has to say of itself” (p. 40). It is questionable, however, whether his view is not grounded in a notion which tends to set divine and human activity over against each other. Young rejects a mechanical theory (p. 65). It does, however, appear that his own view is really no more than a modification of this view. His interpretation of the working of the Spirit in the inspiration of Scripture is not directly identifiable with mechanical dictation (pp. 79-80). It does seem, however, that there is a tendency to move in that direction.  * Here are some statements from Young.  - “Without Him (God) there could have been no Bible. Without man th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Psalm 72

Read the words - ‘His Name’ shall ‘endure for ever’(Psalm 72:17) - and think of Christ. His Name is ‘the Name above all other names’. He is ‘the King of kings and Lord of lords’(Philippians 2:9-11; Revelation 19:16). Read the words - ‘all nations call Him blessed’(Psalm 72:17) - , and think of Christ. ‘From every tribe and language and people and nation’, God’s people have been redeemed by the precious blood of Christ (Revelation 5:9). Read the words -‘May His glory fill the whole earth!’(Psalm 72:19) - and think of Christ. In the ‘new heaven and new earth’, ‘the holy city’ will shine with ‘the glory of God’. ‘Its radiance’, ‘like a very precious jewel’, will be shining from this ‘lamp’: Jesus Christ, ‘the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world’(Revelation 21:1-2,10-11,23; John 1:29).
Post a Comment
Read more

Theological Anthropology

It might be argued that Berkouwer’s concentration on man’s relation to God is no more than the adoption of a particular religious theory of man rather than dealing with the real man. Berkouwer insists that, from the standpoint of Christian faith, the situation is quite the reverse. He insists that we are not dealing with “an abstract idea of man, but with actual man” ( Man: The Image of God, p. 13, emphasis original). From the standpoint of faith, it is the view of man in relation to God, and not the view of man as rational, free or personal, which deals with the actual man, who stands outlined in the searching light of the revelation of God” (p. 30). Emphasizing “the indissoluble Biblical relation between knowledge of man and knowledge of self” , Berkouwer writes,”The Jew did not have a better understanding because he was able to judge the heathen. In the sphere of abstract morality this could possibly be said, but this is not Biblical morality - O man, who judgest others!...
Post a Comment
Read more