Concerning the interpretation of divine freedom, Berkouwer gave this
warning: "waving the banner of absolute divine autonomy does not dam up
anguishing questions, and is certainly not likely to lead to praise" (A
Half Century of Theology, p. 92). He did not wish to question the divine
freedom. He sought to clarify its meaning in a way that "phrases like
'incontestible freedom' and ... 'absolute possibility'" (A Half Century
of Theology, p. 91) fail to do. He insisted that the New Testament
"avoids a dialectic between divine freedom and human freedom" (A Half
Century of Theology, p. 101). He emphasized that divine freedom should
be understood in connection with divine goodness (A Half Century of
Theology, p. 91 - referring to Matthew 20:15). He maintained that divine
freedom reminds man that he must not presume on divine goodness. He
emphasized that divine freedom serves as " summons to conversion" (A
Half Century of Theology, p. 91 - referring to Matthew 22:14 and Matthew
20:16).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured post
Some European Theologians
Pannenberg, Wolfhart (1928-2014) German theologian. Born in Stettin (now Szczecin), Poland, he studied at the universities of Berlin, G...
-
Carl E. Braaten has written that "Serious reservations ... must be voiced against the dominant position of the idea of revelation in t...
-
From the majestic perfection of God and the privileged responsibility of humanity, we now move to the evil subtlety of Satan. An intruder...
No comments:
Post a Comment