Here's an attempt
to bring things together. (1) man knows of grace through revelation.
(2) divine revelation comes to man in the form of human language. (3)
The inadequacy of human language as a vehicle of divine revelation
demands that due care be taken in the interpretation of Scripture. (4)
The inadequacy of human language as a vehicle of divine revelation
demands an avoidance of undue dogmatism regarding the precise meaning of
Scripture. (5) The idea of a depth dimension points beyond the
limitations of human language to the profound spiritual realities of the
eternal God and His eternal salvation.
In this post, I will draw comparisons between Arminius and Berkouwer. * Bangs points out that the historical situation in Holland was not a simple one - Calvinism coming in, Arminius nearly ruining it and the Synod of Dort restoring it: “The earliest Dutch Reformed leaders don’t seem to be Calvinists at all. They rise out of the soil, here and there, nurtured by the old Dutch biblical piety, not seized by dogmatic insights, but steadily pressing toward a purified life of faith according to Scripture” (p. 21). This emphasis is similar to Berkouwer’s insistence that election is not a special gnosis for the theological elite. Rather, it is a confession of faith, arising from the hearts of those who have come to know the grace of God ( Divine Election (DE), p. 216). * Bangs observes that Arminius’ theological method is “practical and through faith”: “For the Theology which belongs to this world, is practical and through faith: Theoretical Theology belongs to the o...
Comments
Post a Comment