There’s realism in the ministry of Jeremiah. He prophesies the
Babylonian captivity. There is also hope. He looks beyond the Babylonian
captivity: “They will be taken to Babylon and stay there.I come for
them, declares the Lord. I will take them from there and bring them back
to this place” (Jeremiah 27:22). The way we are led may not be easy.
The destination will be glorious. When things are going badly, we must
never lose sight of the final goal of God’s working in us and through
us. Beyond the suffering, there is the glory.
In this post, I will draw comparisons between Arminius and Berkouwer. * Bangs points out that the historical situation in Holland was not a simple one - Calvinism coming in, Arminius nearly ruining it and the Synod of Dort restoring it: “The earliest Dutch Reformed leaders don’t seem to be Calvinists at all. They rise out of the soil, here and there, nurtured by the old Dutch biblical piety, not seized by dogmatic insights, but steadily pressing toward a purified life of faith according to Scripture” (p. 21). This emphasis is similar to Berkouwer’s insistence that election is not a special gnosis for the theological elite. Rather, it is a confession of faith, arising from the hearts of those who have come to know the grace of God ( Divine Election (DE), p. 216). * Bangs observes that Arminius’ theological method is “practical and through faith”: “For the Theology which belongs to this world, is practical and through faith: Theoretical Theology belongs to the o...
Comments
Post a Comment