Jeremiah was fearless in his preaching of God’s Word. He spoke the
truth. He spoke the Word which had been given to him by the Lord. When
God speaks the Word of His holiness, the Word which exposes sin for what
it really is, there is no place to hide. When we read Jeremiah’s words
about Israel’s enemies, we must recognize that the Word of God
concerning sin must be spoken clearly. It is only when there is
conviction of sin that there can be conversion to the Saviour.
The question of universalism in Barth’s theology has been raised directly by J D Bettis in his article, “Is Karl Barth a Universalist?” (Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 20, No. 4, December 1967, pp. 423-436). This article requires to be carefully discussed not only for its significance as an interpretation of Barth’s thought but also because it presents a serious misrepresentation of Berkouwer’s criticism of Barth. Bettis writes, “Modern protestant theology has defined three basic answers to the question of the particularity of election: double predestination, Arminianism and universalism” (p. 423). By attempting to fit Berkouwer into “this structure of alternatives” (p. 423), he misrepresents completely Berkouwer’s criticism of Barth. According to Bettis, Brunner and Berkouwrer hold that “because Barth fails to accept either Brunner’s Arminianism or Berkouwer's double decree, he must be a universalist” (p. 426). There are two misrepresentations of Berkouwer here. (...
Comments
Post a Comment