In Exodus 20, we read "the Ten Commandments", and, straightaway, we may be on our guard against legalism. In Exodus 20:5, we read words that make us feel that we, sinners, can't possibly come into the presence of the God of perfect holiness: "I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate Me." As we read such words, we may wonder, "Is this all that God has to say to us?" As we read on to Exodus 20:6, we read something else, something that we could easily miss: "showing love to a thousand generations of those who love Me and keep My commandments." How wonderful it is that in the heart of the Law, there is this word of love! Is it still demanding of us something that is beyond us - loving God and keeping His commandments? Yes! That's what the Law says to us - but, still, there is this glimpse of God's love, which leads our thoughts beyond the broken Law and the jealous God. To see all that God is saying to us about His eternal love, we need to travel from Mount Sinai, the place where the Law was given, to Mount Calvary, the place where Jesus, God's beloved Son, "loved us and gave Himself for us" (Galatians 2:20). There, it becomes clearer to us - God loves us, and He will never stop loving us. As His love reaches and changes us, He will lift us out of our sin and guilt. He will give us the strength that we need - to love Him and walk with Him in the pathway of true holiness of life.
E J Young argues that one’s doctrine of Scripture is derived from either experience or Scripture, either natural man or supernatural God. Young does speak of the human character of Scripture. It does, however, seem that the supernatural-natural dichotomy underlies his doctrine of Scripture. He turns to the Bible “to discover what it has to say of itself” (p. 40). It is questionable, however, whether his view is not grounded in a notion which tends to set divine and human activity over against each other. Young rejects a mechanical theory (p. 65). It does, however, appear that his own view is really no more than a modification of this view. His interpretation of the working of the Spirit in the inspiration of Scripture is not directly identifiable with mechanical dictation (pp. 79-80). It does seem, however, that there is a tendency to move in that direction. * Here are some statements from Young. - “Without Him (God) there could have been no Bible. Without man th...
Comments
Post a Comment